The Global Warming Strategic Management.

Global WarmingThe five sources discuss the causes of global warming and explain what causes global warming in the world. However, the articles still demonstrate how scientists deal with global warming and how differently they do it. For the lay people, they normally plant trees as a way to try to reduce the global warming. But still they use farming inputs which are dangerous to the atmosphere without understanding that they are a huge anger to the environment. Also as they plant trees it is not clear to them why they are planting trees but then understand one is supposed to replace a tree with other trees. That is a result of how the scientist present the issues to the lay people. They normally fail to go into details instead they advise them to plant trees as many as possible and whenever thy cut some own they should replace them with triple or double the trees cut down.Another way the lay people are presented the issues is by being told the angers that come with global warming. For instance instead of the researching telling the lay people about global warming, what cause the global warming they choose to tell them that the use of gas and electricity has some dangerous consequences to their bodies and the environment. That contribute to the lay person choosing to use other source of energy and other means of transport to avoid harming themselves. But when asked they cannot tell why they are doing or cannot give details about their choices. In other words the scientist while communicating to the lay people they avoiding making information complicate rather they mention the important parts that help in solving the problem.However when it comes to scientist communicating among themselves they analyses the issues into the details. They normally start with the causes of global warming, the effects and the possible solutions. Also since they are groups of scientist in their discussions they use scientific terminologies which they cannot use while communicating to the lay people. Their discussion involves a lot presentation of ideas, asking questions and showcasing evidences for each claim which is different from what they tell the lay people.In scientist discussions they normally begin with brainstorming about the problems that are facing the world. They start looking at the possible cause to the problems and they take time to do experiments. In their discussions they table the causes an experiment them or go to the field to fin evidences concerning the claims they have. They come back with evidences and present them to their colleagues who support them or oppose them. Every scientist who opposes the claim given by their fellow scientist come up with their reasons why they oppose. The same case to the scientist who supports the claim.The difference in how the two groups present the information differently shows that the level of knowledge an understanding matters. That is because the scientists have a higher understanding and knowledge about the issues that causes global warming while the lay people lack information while others do not even understand what is global warming. That results to the scientists only informing the lay man about the consequences of global warming so that they can instill fear in them and make the do the right thing that helps in the stopping of global warming. But when it comes to presenting the issues to the scientist they give the details and table all the information as they use the terminologies that revolve in that field of study. They also ask questions among each other where they have some doubts about the topic on discussion.
 
ReferencesAnsoff, H. I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A. O., Helm-Stevens, R.,