The Non African Americans discussion and recommendations.

REVIEWER _____________________________________ STUDENT AUTHOR ________________________________DISCUSSION SECTION PEER REVIEWRespond to the following statements to provide additional feedback for the author of the paper you reviewed.1. What are the key findings from this study? Are they presented in such a way that they achieve the study’s goals (do they answer the research question intended)?The research study found that 77.2 percent of African-Americans were unable to wake up, 73.7 % had shallow breathing, and 71% experience skin color changes, while 82% of Non-African-Americans failed to wake up, 78.3% experienced slow breathing, and 69.2% had skin color changes.The findings answer some of the research questions about opioid drugs, and the presentation is in such a way that it achieves the study’s goal.
2. Do the authors relate their studys findings to previous study findings? If not, what could they do to improve this?
The authors do not relate the current findings to the previous findings of the research study. The authors need to compare their findings to the earlier findings of the research study. Results should be discussed in the context of prior research studies. The author should brief the related findings and explain how they contradict or support them. The author should briefly discuss the research context and mention several previous studies in the introduction. A thorough explanation of prior studies should be given in the discussion part.
 
3. Name 1-2 strengths and 1-2 weaknesses of this study. Describe any strengths and weaknesses the authors missed.StrengthsThe objective of the research study was clearly stated. The study objective is to find out the symptoms of opioid overdose.The study also indicated the exclusion and inclusion criteria and presented a flow chart of the findings.WeaknessesThe study did not include previous findings in the current study.Data extraction and article selection were not made in duplicate.
 
4. What are the critical implications of this study (i.e., what do we do now that the study has been completed)?There is no difference in adults in zip codes 31907 and 31903 and how they dispose of their opioids. The adults used a variety of techniques to dispose of their opioid drugs. 41.2% of the adults in zip code 31903 threw the opioid prescriptions in the trash, while 31% of those in zip code 31907 took them back to the drug store.
5. Provide any additional comments that could help the author improve his/her paper. (consider the quality of writing, APA, organization, etc…)The author should include an introduction, an Objective of the study, a statement of purpose, a Methodology, a discussion, and recommendations.The author should also include APA formatting and referencing style in the paper.